Fighting Follower

Every successful new media sector deals with some type of fraud as the space matures. Learn how to safeguard a brand’s value with a data-first approach to creator audience integrity.

"CreatorIQ empowers Unilever to set global measurement standards for the influencer marketing industry."
Unilever
Vasiliki Petrou, EVP and Group CEO of Prestige, Unilever

3 Tell Tale Signs of Fraud

The influencer marketing industry is projected to be worth $5 to $10 billion by 2020, but follower fraud —specifically when creators pay for fake social media followers, or bots that manipulate their engagement numbers— has kept pace as the space becomes more valuable. To date, brands have utilized half measures, for example vetting creators with simple vanity metrics. However, these measures don’t go far enough.

Taking a multi-channel, data-first approach is necessary to provide a more conclusive method for evaluating audience integrity. Here, we summarize three key ways of spotting creators with inauthentic activity:
Audience Location Percentage

One obvious flag of follower fraud is when a creator’s audience over-indexes in countries with which they have little association. Brazil for example, is one of the primary global hot spots for follower farms.

An inverse relationship between engagement rate and follower count suggests inauthentic, non-engaged followings. However, engagement rate varies by industry and follower size, so it is important to consider industry benchmarks and larger accounts with a natural attrition to engagement rate.

Abnormal <br>Engagement Rate
Audience Growth

Spikes in follower acquisition can be warranted, for example, after a publicity event or when a creator’s name goes viral. However, if growth shoots up but engagement remains flat, this can be a good indicator that a creator has purchased fake followers.

Right Bg
Left Bg
Curious to learn about other 6 factors used to spot inauthentic activity?
Read our Definitive Guide to Spotting Follower Fraud
Treasure Chest

Eliminate influencer marketing risk